Paradox of Self-Amendment by Peter Suber Swift, H.H., "Adaptation of Law to Changing Social and Economic Conditions," Georgia Bar Association, (1925) 189-213. Swindler, William F. (ed.). Sources and Documents of United States Constitutions. Oceana Publications, 10 vols., 1973. Swineburne, Richard, "Omnipotence," American Philosophical Quarterly, 10 (1973) 231-37. Swisher, Carl Brent. American Constitutional Development. Houghton Mifflin Co., 2d ed. 1954. Taft, Henry W., "Amendment of the Federal Constitution: Is the Power Conferred by Article V Limited by the Tenth Amendment?" Virginia Law Review, 16 (1930) 647-58. Taft, William Howard, "Can Ratification of an Amendment to the Constitution Be Made to Depend on a Referendum?" Yale Law Journal, 29 (1920) 821-25. Tammelo, Ilmar, "The Antinomy of Parliamentary Sovereignty," Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, 44 (1958) 495-513. See reply by J. Hintikka, q.v. Tammelo, Ilmar, "'Cartesian Turn' in the Theory of Law," Sydney Law Review, 1 (1954) 214-21. Tammelo, Ilmar, "Law, Logic, and Human Communication," Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, (1964) 331-366. Tammelo, Ilmar, "Legal and Extra-Legal Justification," Journal of Legal Education, 17 (1965) 412-22. Tammelo, Ilmar, "Logic As An Instrument of Legal Reasoning," Jurimetrics Journal, 10 (1970) 89-94. Tammelo, Ilmar, "On the Logical Openness of Legal Orders," American Journal of Comparative Law, 8 (1959) 187-203. Tammelo, Ilmar. Modern Logic in the Service of Law. Springer Verlag, 1978. Review by P.E. Davis, q.v. Tammelo, Ilmar. Outlines of Modern Legal Logic. Franz Steiner Verlag, 1969. Tammelo, Ilmar, "Sketch for a Symbolic Juristic Logic," Journal of Legal Education, 8 (1955) 277-306. Tammelo, Ilmar, "Some Aspects of Recent Contributions to Logic in the Service of Law," Sydney Law Review, 5 (1966) 261-66. Tammelo, Ilmar, "Tests of Inconsistency Between Commonwealth and State Laws," Australian Law Journal, 30 (1957) 496-501. Tanger, Jacob, "Amending Procedure of the Federal Constitution," American Political Science Review, 10 (1916) 689-99. Tanger, Jacob, "Recent Proposals to Amend the Constitution of the United States," Temple Law Quarterly, 11 (1936) 28-45. Tansill, C.C. Proposed Amendments to the Constitution of the United States Introduced in Congress from December 4, 1889 to July 2, 1926. United States Government Printing Office, 1926. (This work supplements H.V. Ames, q.v.) Tapper, C.F.H., "Powers and Secondary Rules of Change," in A.W.B. Simpson (ed.), Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence, Second Series, Oxford University Press, 1973, pp. 242-77. Tay, A. E.-S., "'Smash Permanent Rules': China as a Model for the Future," Sydney Law Review, 7 (1976) 400-23. Teubner, Gunther, "Autopoiesis in Law and Society: A Rejoinder to Blankenburg," Law and Society Review, 18 (1984) 291. (See E. Blankenburg, 1984.) Teubner, Gunther, "Legal Autopoiesis and Legal Evolution," European University Institute Colloquium Papers, 1985. Teubner, Gunther (ed.). Reflexive Law: Autonomy and Regulation. Walter de Gruyter, 1986. Teubner, Gunther, "Social Order from Legislative Noise? Autopoietic Closure as a Problem for Legal Regulation," European University Institute Colloquium Papers, 1985. Teubner, Gunther, "Substantive and Reflexive Elements in Modern Law," Law and Society Review, 17 (1983) 239. Themaat, H.L. van, "The Equality of Status of the Dominions and the Sovereignty of the British Parliament," Journal of Comparative Legislation, 3d series, 15 (1953) 47-53. Thomas, David Y., "Amending a State Constitution by Custom," American Political Science Review, 23 (1929) 920-21. Thompson, J. David, "The Amendment of the Federal Constitution," Proceedings of the Academy of Political Science, 3 (1912) 65-77. 214