Paradox of Self-Amendment by Peter Suber Luhmann, Niklas, "Some Problems with Reflexive Law," in G. Teubner (ed.), Reflexive Law: Autonomy and Regulation, Walter de Gruyter, 1986. Lumb, R.D., "Fundamental Law and the Processes of Constitutional Change in Australia," Federal Law Review, 9 (1978) 148-84. Lumb, R.D., "Natural Law —An Unchanging Standard?" Catholic Lawyer, 6 (1960) 224. Lunt, Dudley C., "Amending the Constitution," Lawyer and Banker, 23 (1930) 252-54. Lyons, D., "On Formal Justice," Cornell Law Review, 58 (1973) 833-61. Lyons, D., "Logic and Coercion in Bentham's Theory of Law," Cornell Law Review, 57 (1972) 335-62. M., L.W., "Logic of the Illogical," Solicitors' Journal, 102 (June 14, 1958) 428-29. MacChesney, B., "The Fallacies in the Case for the Bricker Amendment," Notre Dame Lawyer, 29 (1954) 529-82. MacCormick, Neil. Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory. Oxford University Press, 1978. Review by P.D. White, q.v. MacCormick, Neil, "Legal Reasoning and Practical Reason," in Peter A. French et al. (eds.), Midwest Studies in Philosophy, vol. 7, Social and Political Philosophy, University of Minnesota Press, 1982. MacDonald, William. A New Constitution for a New America. B.W. Huebsch, Inc., 1921. Machen, Arthur, Jr., "Is the Fifteenth Amendment Void?" Harvard Law Review, 23 (1910) 169-93. Mackie, J.L., "Evil and Omnipotence," Mind, 64 (1955) 200-12, revised in his "Omnipotence," Sophia, 1 (1962) 13-25. Mackie, J.L. Truth, Probability, and Paradox: Studies in Philosophical Logic. Oxford University Press, 1973. Maki, John M. (ed.). Japan's Commission On the Constitution: The Final Report. University of Washington Press, 1980. Mallory, J.R., "Amending the Constitution [of Canada] by Stealth," Queen's Quarterly, 82 (Autumn 1975) 394-401. Marbury, William, "The Limitations Upon the Amending Power," Harvard Law Review, 33 (1919) 223-35. Marbury, William, "The Nineteenth Amendment and After," Virginia Law Review, 7 (1920) 1-29. Markandan, K.C. The Amending Process and Constitutional Amendments in the Indian Constitution. New Delhi: Sterling Publishers, 1972. Marshall, Geoffrey. Constitutional Theory. Oxford University Press, 1971. Marshall, Geoffrey. Parliamentary Sovereignty and the Commonwealth. Oxford University Press, 1957. Marshall, Geoffrey, "Parliamentary Sovereignty and the Language of Constitutional Limitation," Juridical Review, 67 (1955) 62-78. Marshall, Geoffrey, "Parliamentary Sovereignty: A Recent Development," McGill Law Journal, 12 (1966-67) 523-27. Marshall, Geoffrey, "What is Parliament? The Changing Concept of Parliamentary Sovereignty," Political Studies, 2, 3 (1954) 193-209. Martig, Ralph R., "Amending the Constitution. Article Five; The Keystone of the Arch," Michigan Law Review, 35 (1937) 1253-85. Martin, Robert L. (ed.). The Paradox of the Liar. Yale University Press, 1970; 2d ed. 1987. Martin, Robert L. (ed.). Recent Essays on Truth and the Liar Paradox. Oxford University Press, 1984. Martin, William Logan, "Amending Power: The Ebinger Proposal," American Bar Association Journal, 40 (1954) 767-71, 802-03, 974-45. Martin, William Logan, "Amending Power: Background of the Income Tax Amendment," American Bar Association Journal, 39 (1953) 21-24, 77-80, 124-27, 167-68. Mason, M.S., "Logical Structure of a Proposition of Law," Jurimetrics, 11 (1971) 99-122. Mavrodes, George I., "Some Puzzles Concerning Omnipotence," Philosophical Review, 72 (1963) 221-23. Maynez, Eduardo Garcia, "Some Considerations on the Problem of Antinomies in the Law," Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, 49, 1 (1963) 1- 14. Mayo, Bernard, "Mr. Keene on Omnipotence," Mind, 70 (1961) 249-50. 207